| |
|
Article: <5f1hia$1o9@sjx-ixn7.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: EXPLOSIONS - the Zetas Explain
Date: 26 Feb 1997 14:32:42 GMT
In article <5ev51j$us@pollux.cmc.ec.gc.ca> Greg Neill
writes:
>>> The photon rules electromagnetism. I defy you to
prove
>>> otherwise.
>>> ynecgan@cmc.doe.ca (Greg Neill)
>
>> (Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
>> Lets take the familiar example you were exposed to in
grade
>> school. Magnets. They obviously have magnetism, just are
>> not emitting light.
>
> We do the experiment with the magnetic compass being
> deflected by the current carrying wire. We do the
> galvanometer experiment, where a magnet moved through
> a coil of wire creates a current in the wire. So we have
seen
> that the magnetic and electric fields are intimately
interrelated.
> Later we study the photoelectric effect, and discover that
light
> is electromagnetic in nature.
> ynecgan@cmc.doe.ca (Greg Neill)
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
Guilt by association? All criminals have hair so crime is caused
by hair? Do you think that subatomic particles are INDIFFERENT to
having their neighborhood disturbed? Flood an object with light
and it will heat up, because the light particles, of which there
are many, are crowding the area and changing the dynamics of how
these particles are moving around in relationship to each other.
A square dance performed under water has entirely different
dynamics than one on a dance floor - more kicking and paddling
and a slower pace. A picnic in the park looks vastly different
during a hurricane - the goodies and attendees moving in
different directions and at a much higher speed, with scarcely
ANY of the old interactions sustained during that time.
If you insist on this silly assumption, then tell us what
aspect of this SINGLE subatomic particle causes magnetic
attraction or repulsion, and explain why light doesn't have this
aspect.
(End ZetaTalk[TM])