| |
|
Article: <5dsp5c$bts@sjx-ixn8.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: Disproving Nancy
Date: 12 Feb 1997 15:55:24 GMT
In article
<Pine.OSF.3.91.970211213205.2276A-100000@zuaxp0.star.ucl.ac.uk>
Richard Townsend writes:
> Nancy, come clean. Either demonstrate that everything you
> have to say is scientific by giving us a means to disprove
> your hypotheses (and, indeed, the means to disprove the
> fact that the Zetas exist), or accept that nothing you have
> to say has any Scientific basis - in which case, stop
arguing
> against current scientific theories when you have no
> alternative SCIENCE (pseudo-science and codswallop,
> maybe, but not science).
> Richard Townsend <rhdt@star.ucl.ac.uk>
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
The evidence we point to is the same evidence you humans point to
- THE SAME. The revolution of planets, the fact that object drop
toward the Earth, attracted by gravity, the fact that water and
air spins in different directions when on different parts of the
globe - this is the data that we are using in our arguments. Are
we and our emissary, Nancy, to be held to a different standard
than you? And why is that? Because we make you uncomfortable?
You're a little less smug when we poke holes in your logic?
You're a little less secure when we point out that global warming
could not account for the increased heating of the oceans, which
as your scientists know and have reported occurs from the bottom
up, from the water closest to the core? You feel uneasy seeing
that your government is lying to you about Hale-Bopp and Planet
X, that cover-ups exist, and wonder what else they may be
withholding from you?
More often than not, theories cannot be DISPROVED unless one
has complete control of a setting, including ALL the variables.
This doesn't occur in your labs, if you're honest enough to admit
it. Yet YOU can post anything on this message board and not be
challenged. That's because anything YOU have to say, Richard,
allows your fellows to remain smug and comfy, their precepts
unchallenged and their little world remaining the same until THEY
choose to change it. Fantasy, in those who accuse our emissary,
Nancy of fantasy.
(End ZetaTalk[TM])