Re: GRAVITY - the Zetas Explain

Article: <5cmmj9$q29@dfw-ixnews12.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: GRAVITY - the Zetas Explain
Date: 29 Jan 1997 05:18:33 GMT

In article <32E9DD9E.73EB@acs.tamu.edu> Eric Kline writes:
> Aurora are caused by charged particles radiated by the sun,
> getting caught in the Earth's magnetic field and travelling
> along the field lines into the atmosphere near the poles.
> These charged particles sometimes hit atmospheric atoms
> exciting the atoms (transferring energy to the atmosphere).
> The atmospheric atoms return to their rest state by radiating
> a photon. These photons make up the aurora. Gravity plays
> no role in either phenomona.
> eric kline <emk9267@acs.tamu.edu>

(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
Ah, well in that case, you should be able to easily recreate all this in your laboratories, right? What do you need for this experiment. Charged particles from the Sun that could get moved about by a magnetic field.

• You're getting sunlight all the time, and unless you're saying that there isn't an even distribution of these charged particles emanating from the Sun, which would stand contrary to everything man knows about sunlight, then you'd get at least SOME of those charged particles falling on your head even when you stand at the equator.

• Magnetic fields are a snap in the laboratory, as every handyman's motor supply attests. Anyone can generate a magnetic field, scientist or no.

So this means, if your theory is correct, that folks standing around a large electric motor should be viewing auroras. Do they? NO! In fact, auroras have not been recreated in the laboratory, but that doesn't stop humans from believing whatever silly explanation has been handed out. The term circumstantial evidence comes to mind. You let criminals walk free if this is the only evidence, but since auroras happen at the poles, and magnetic fields happen at the poles, then the case is close. Wake up and THINK!
(End ZetaTalk[TM])

In article <32E9DD9E.73EB@acs.tamu.edu> Eric Kline writes:
> You've claimed that gravity plays the dominant role in aurora.
> If that were the case, then aurora would be visible world wide.
> Why aren't they? What is special about the poles that aurora
> are only visible there? It's known that the Earth's magnetic
> field lines converge on the poles (exiting one and entering the
> other). Do you suggest gravity does the same?
> eric kline <emk9267@acs.tamu.edu>

(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
Bending light rays, such as happen in an aurora or at sunset or dawn, are only visible when the normal complement of light in Sunlight is DIMINISHED. Your senses are designed to sort out all the input into patterns that your brain can recognize. You don't REGISTER all the noise, else thinking would be impossible. Can you consider thousands of factors at once, or a dozen? Don't you understand the concept of the presence of a light particle being drowned out by the overwhelming presence of another particle type? If your wife was standing in the middle of a chorus that was singing Happy Days Are Here Again at the top of their lungs, and if she could only speak in a whisper, and if you could only LISTEN and not look, would you hear your wife? Would you even know she was there?
(End ZetaTalk[TM])