link to Home Page
The ZetaTalk Newsletter
Issue 11, Sunday Feb 18, 2007
Weekly news and views from around the world and beyond.
New ZetaTalkEarth ChangesAnnouncementsSigns of the Times
Iran Confrontation Failing

The Zetas addressed the issue of a fabricated excuse to attack Iran almost a year ago, anticipating this next card to be played by a White House eager to grab the oil fields of Iran as they have with the oil fields of Iraq.

ZetaTalk Prediction 3/17/2006: Iran is the 4th largest in oil production, and holds the 3rd largest oil reserves, so securing this under US occupation has been a goal of the Bush crowd all along. The likely outcome is that the US will threaten and bluster, plant evidence against Iran that the US citizen and the world does not believe, rumble tanks and planes up to the border of Iran, and there the conflict stops. There will certainly be tense moments behind closed doors when the military is asked to take steps they refuse to take, confrontations that will not come out in the media until later, as leaks. Although this is in the hands of man and man has free will, and thus any predictions must be predicated on this, we predict that Bush will not succeed in invading or bombing Iran, though orders may be given to the military to do so.

Is there evidence the Bush administration has been planning an Iran attack, all along? Yes indeed!

Ex-Bush Iran official: US seeks pretext for conflict with Iran
February 12, 2007
A former top Bush administration official for Persian Gulf affairs has said in an interview this morning on CNN that the US may be trying to spark a conflict with Iran.

And lo and behold, the planted evidence the Zetas predicted has emerged. Rockets, hitting US tanks, manufactured in Iran.

Pentagon blames Iran for 170 US deaths
Feb 12, 2007
America today blamed Iran for the deaths of 170 US troops inside Iraq, accusing Teheran of supplying insurgents with increasingly sophisticated bombs. Senior defense officials in Baghdad said that Iranian-supplied projectiles were frequently being used against coalition forces. They said the highest levels of Iran's regime were responsible for giving them to Shia militias in Iraq. They added that some weapons have been captured and they bore the hallmarks of having been manufactured in Iran. Many were made as recently as last year - ruling out the possibility that they could have been left over from the many arms caches scattered across Iraq by Saddam Hussein's regime.

But are these Iranian rockets? Iranian arms carry the description in Farsi, the native language.

Doesn't Look Like Farsi To Me?
Feb 12, 2007
Markings on the Zelzal 2 rocket are in Farsi. Here are Persian serial numbers etched onto a handgun. Is this pattern of numbers to be found on other similar weapons, made by other countries? This Russian 82mm has the markings etched in Russian. Might not be from Iran, but from Pakistan.

And indeed, Pakistan manufactures these rockets, for sale (photo at right), labeling them in English.
81 MM HE M 57 D A-2
The bomb is used against personnel and light material providing both fragmentation & blast effect.

Per an Israeli think tank, Iran does not even manufacture 81MM rockets.

Pentagon Caught Red Handed in an attempt to Frame Iran:
Iran Does Not Manufacture 81MM Mortar Shells
February 13, 2007
The 81mm mortar shell offered up to the complaisant corporate media as "evidence" Iran is supplying weaponry to the Shi'a of Iraq is an obvious ruse, as the date on the proffered shell does not follow the Muslim calendar and other markings are in English when it only makes sense they would appear in Persian script. But it gets worse. Iran does not manufacture 81mm mortar shells. The best the US government can give us today is incendiary evidence presented at a Baghdad news conference by three US officials who refuse to be quoted by name?

Indeed, General Pace, head of the Joint Chiefs, was unaware this presentation to the media was even being made in Baghdad, and stated he had seen no evidence that the government of Iran itself was involved in such sales. The US media, at first reporting what the White House wanted, expressed doubts within days.

On Iran Weapons, Major Papers May Have Second Thoughts
February 13, 2007
On Saturday, The New York Times featured on its front page a lengthy story by Michael Gordon warning that the deadliest weapon killing Americans in Iraq come from Iran. On Tuesday, however, the same paper's editorial page casts strong doubt on all this. The Washington Post on Tuesday also raises doubts, after that paper carried its own Iran weapons story in an equally prominent way for most of Sunday and Monday.

And what do the Zetas have to say, now that a troop surge into Iraq, convenient for an invasion of Iran, and the movement of many aircraft carriers into the Persian Gulf and vicinity, convenient for bombing raids on Iran, and claims about Iran weapons helping the insurgents has occurred?

ZetaTalk Answer 2/17/2007: Predicting, last March, that evidence against Iran would be planted by a White House eager to force the US Military to attack Iran, was an easy feat by ourselves, as the thought was in so many minds congregating in the White House. As they faltered on the evidence they used to make claims against Iraq - the Nigerian Yellow Cake sales, the nuclear bombs being manufactured by Saddam - they wanted actual weapons to display this time around. Does Iran produce rockets? Certainly. Are they being pushed into Iraq? No. They are for use by their own military. If one wanted to examine the weapons being used in Iraq, today, dozens of countries would be represented as the source. Primarily, weapons manufactured in the US! Theft of weapons from US bases to supply arms dealers the CIA wishes to partner with has long been an issue in the US. Should the world attack the US because its arms are found in the hands of criminals? Many European countries are selling arms, Russia and China and Pakistan are selling arms. And the number of countries acting as trading partners is even larger.

An easy feat by the CIA, to gather some arms manufactured by Iran and plop them into the hands of those in the US Military willing to say anything for a reduced stay in the Green Zone, forseen as a death trap by even the naïve required to remain in Baghdad. Unlike the days leading up to the Iraqi invasion, the Congress and press and American public are not trusting anything the White House and their allies say, they are demanding proof. A timid presentation in Baghdad, by unofficial spokespersons presenting rockets that are manufactured in many countries and can be postured to appear as though they are from Iran, is simply not enough. What's next? This pathetic display shows the desperation the Bush White House is feeling as they see their last chance to snatch the oil fields of Iran slipping away. Israel will not act alone, and the US Military is reluctant and putting up blocks to any orders Bush might issue. Iran is refusing to react to provocation. The case is lost! The next card to be played will be one played by Planet X, as it looms closer and more violent earthquakes and adjustments in the stretch zones occur. The US Military will be needed at home, and as we have predicted, will be called home or chased home by turmoil in Iraq, leaving Iraq to its fate.

Phoenix Lights a Warning

On Feb 7, 2007, almost a full year after the original Phoenix Lights had occurred on March 13, 1997, they were back, and looking very similar!

Mysterious Lights Spotted Over Phoenix, Again
Feb 7, 2007
Nearly a decade after the highly publicized 'Phoenix Light Phenomenon', more strange lights have appeared in the night sky over downtown Phoenix. Mysterious lights lit up the western skies over Phoenix and soon after, phones began ringing off the hook at radio, television and police stations from witnesses wondering what the lights were. Back in March of 1997, a huge object was spotted over parts of Arizona that many witnesses believed to be an extraterrestrial spacecraft that was drifting slowly and silently over the region.

These videos show a similarity to the Feb 7, 1997 Phoenix Lights phenomena: when compared to the recent, Mar 13, 1997, event: I, Nancy, watched the video from the recent mass sighting and also concluded they could not be flares. For one thing, where the flares were stationary, one of them appears on the right and quickly moved over all the way over to the left. Is wind that selective? Others, inspecting the video, had similar doubts.
Flares hang in the same place for 4 minutes? The military is lighting up targets over a populated area to target? Did anyone hear explosions? One flare at least that moves from right to left. Something does not add up here.

The Zetas chose to put this in context with all the recent UFO blitzes that have hit the news, around the world. The blitz is a warning!

ZetaTalk Explanation: There have been UFO blitzes, that hit the news, in Chicago O'Hare Jan 1, Istanbul Jan 5, Arkansas Jan 15, N Carolina Jan 25, Hawaii Jan 27, London Feb 2, and Phoenix Feb 7 lately. Note the location of these mass sightings, and then note our warnings about what parts of the globe are likely to experience disasters due to the stretch zones pulling apart and related domino quakes as adjustments occur in other areas affected.

The St. Lawrence Seaway is stretching, a fact noted by Nancy for months lately as the Black Hills have been wobbly on the live seismographs. On days when the rest of the world is quiet, the Black Hills stand alone showing its wobble, occurring in 12 hours intervals in accordance with the tugging on the highly magnetized Atlantic Rift by Planet X, which wants this surface magnet to stay in alignment with itself. The yawing Seaway rumples the land in the Black Hills, which is why this land looks like it was thrown in the air, recently, as it was during the last pole shift and in pole shifts prior. Is Chicago exempt from the stretch? Where cities on either side of the Seaway will find they are merely riding along, it is where the stretch is ripping land anew that violence will occur. Lake Michigan is a clue. Why do you supposed the Wisconsin Peninsula formed? Its land was secured to the West, the weak point ripping the land under Lake Michigan, and this rip ending at the Chicago area.

We have stated that Africa is turning in place, its base at S Africa firmly nailed and unable to move, the top rolling to the East as the Atlantic yaws open. This action is what is causing the African Rift to spread so rapidly, in the Afar Triangle, where huge crevasses appear before astonished eyes and the land is dropping hundreds of feet. The Mediterranean will be destabilized. The African plate is a straight line across the top, and when it turns it will create a yaw in the Mediterranean, causing volcanoes in the area to become active as lava is exposed to the surface, and certainly destabilizing countries just to the north of the fault line dissecting the Mediterranean from East to West. The Mediterranean, in the past, was a swamp, but now is a sea. What caused the land to drop? The Black Sea participated in this drop, being inundated where formerly land above water. Istanbul lies at the center of the area that will first be affected when a serious roll of Africa occurs.

We have stated that the great Pacific is not one plate, as assumed, but numerous, uncharted by man who cannot plumb its depths. We have stated that Hawaii will rise during the coming shift, as the plate it is on is pushed up while others subduct, thus giving Hawaii added protection from volcanic explosions, as their volcanoes will ooze, not explode. But Hawaii will be subject to tsunami, aplenty, devastating its coastlines. Thus, UFO sightings there, among those frolicking in the surf, are a warning. London also is in the stretch zone, as its many derailing tube trains attest. Any significant adjustment of the yawing Atlantic will result in further land pulls under London, and suddenly so.

We have stated that the New Madrid is under stress, pulling apart not only from East to West but pulling the N American continent in a diagonal, the New England states moving in a NE direction while Mexico is pulled to the SW. This will do more than rip every fault line from Mexico to Ontario, it will reduce the support under land to the West of the Mississippi, dropping this land in elevation and flooding it. Arkansas, in the Ozarks, will find itself suddenly land that many seek, in their panic. The Carolinas were affected by the New Madrid quake, buildings needing to be stabilized, even though the rocky Appalachian Mountains were not so affected. Why is this? There is a fault line running from the Gulf up along the Eastern seaboard, and this will certainly participate in any New Madrid adjustment.

And why the anniversary blitz of Phoenix lights? Is not the flat dry desert of Arizona expected to remain relatively undisturbed, during the coming pole shift? When the New Madrid adjusts, Mexico will be too far to the West for the current comfort of the West Coast, which will bow in the Southern California and Arizona region. The fault line that runs along Mexico's West coast runs just under the Arizona border, then on up along the West Coast of California. Before the West Coast of the US starts adjusting to the new position of Mexico, with slip-slide adjustments, there will be a bending of the Arizona desert area that will fracture the dry soil, create a breach in the great Colorado River dam, and allow magma to rise in the calderas in the US - Mammoth Lake in California and Yellowstone. If the Hoover dam breaks, whither the city of Phoenix, which lies on flat land and near farm land irrigated by the waters of the Colorado?

You received this Newsletter because you subscribed to the ZetaTalk Newsletter service. If undesired, you can quickly Unsubscribe.